Ze’ev Schiff writes a read-in-full article regarding the results of the war:
The war should be divided into military and political aspects. In military terms, the IDF won on punches landed. Hezbollah suffered a serious blow to all its command and logistics positions; its elite units fought well and with courage, having better knowledge of the terrain. The young IDF conscripts showed willingness to meet the enemy, make sacrifices, and rescue wounded comrades. On the other hand, Israel suffered a heavy blow on its northern towns, and the IDF did not manage to limit the number of rockets launched against the home front. Only Hezbollah’s long-range missiles were really destroyed.
Throughout the war, Israel failed to kill Hezbollah’s leadership. The air force proved its mettle north of the Litani River, but failed in its efforts against short-range rockets in the south. The air force’s advanced technology was insufficient to meet every operational problem it confronted.
Israel’s deterrence lies in its air force and willingness to respond immediately and forcefully against large targets such as Beirut. This is a lesson for Damascus. There are those in the cabinet who believe that the air force caused too much damage. Others believe that the IDF should have been more aggressive. Nasrallah knows what would happen to his organization and Lebanon if Israel is challenged again.
I think there will be much discussion in coming weeks about what happened. I also think that the Israeli army will adapt to Hezbullah’s tactics of firing anti-tank missiles at soldiers. Oh. And I also think that the cease-fire will not hold. It’s already been broken. And Baby Assad has been enboldened by his ability to send missiles at Israel via his clients in Lebanon. Daddy couldn’t liberate the Golan, and the Dorktator thinks he will be able to. I’m thinking not.
I’m also thinking that Bibi Netanyahu thinks he can make political hay out of Ehud Olmert’s failure to get a clean victory.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Monday afternoon that Israel’s month-long military offensive in Lebanon had dealt Hezbollah a “harsh blow,” and vowed to continue to pursue the leaders of militant organization.
But speaking after Olmert, opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud criticized the government for what he said was its failure to meet its self-declared aims.
By the way, for my American readers who think that Bibi is simply the bee’s knees and should be Prime Minister of Israel: He already was once. He failed miserably, and he won’t get another chance. Israelis can’t stand him. Try not to make the mistake of taking American conservatives’ opinions as meaningful Israeli opinions. They most assuredly are not.
Netanyahu’s future should be as the voice of Israel. His job should be PR, PR, PR. He is eloquent, handsome, charming, and an excellent debater. He should be Israel’s face to the world during all crises and major events.
Not that it will ever happen. He’s too ambitious, still, and his rivals distrust him too much. But he should be Israel’s spokesman. He has a gift for it. I saw him at the West Orange JCC in NJ during Operation Moses, and I was pretty broke at the time. I contributed after I heard him speak.
Don’t run, Bibi. Don’t run.
I’m guessing the big political loser in Israel, besides Olmert personally, are going to be the religious and immigrant parties. There’s going to be a strong desire rebuild and refocus the IDF, which means that parties whose main budgetary focus is anything other than defense will suffer.
Of course, my knowlege of Israeli politics is dwarfed by my knowlege of Norwegian Heavy Metal, so feel free to ignore me.
Yeah, I dunno about Bibi’s future. Israel has to turn to someone. Olmert is out. Peretz is _obviously_ out (and no, I don’t care how many seniors and students insist on voting like idiots). So that leaves Likud or a Kadima rightist. I don’t think the Mofaz will hitch his wagon to Kadima after what Olmert did to him last time – so it’s gotta be Likud. And since there are like 12 people in the Likud today…
Yes, Meryl, there are a lot of Israelis who don’t like Bibi. But that doesn’t mean that he won’t be elected again – the others now in the running are no better than he is (Shalom, Livnat) – and made the mistake of staying in the government when the disengagement was implemented. Yes, Bibi didn’t quit early enough to make a difference – but he did quit. His main weakness is that he caves in to pressure – but if he is the head of a clearly right wing government, and the United States is run by a clearly right wing president, the pressure won’t be that strong. Never say never in Israeli politics.
It’s interesting and informative to get an Israeli’s view of Netanyahu. Every time I see him speaking I’m impressed with him.
I saw him speak a few years ago about how the adjacent arabs say one thing in English and another in arabic. At the time, most people had not been made aware of this, and he put it well in one of those 2 minute grabs.
I’d like to see him represent Israel at the UN but for the fact that Dan Gillerman is such an impressive spokesman for Israel.
How about Ambassador at large to the EU?
Best wishes to Israel from Australia.
I do not understand the antipathy toward Netanyahu. I think he has been very circumspect and restrained in offering criticism of The Israeli government and the conduct of the war.
Daffyd ab Hugh offers an excellent analysis of the recent events.
http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/2006/08/tally_ho.html#more
I feel his comments about new Israeli elections is well taken, given my limited understanding of Israeli politics.
Eugene at Live From an Israeli Bunker offers evidence the Israeli government handled the Lebanon mess badly on a military level.
http://israelibunker.blogspot.com/