Watch how Reuters assists the palestinian attempt to remove all signs of Judaism from Jerusalem by ignoring the existence of the Temple Mount.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has spurned a call by his defense minister to consider halting excavations near Jerusalem’s most sacred Islamic shrine that have angered Muslims, an official said on Thursday.
The dig, outside a compound housing the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosque, has exposed the depth of Arab suspicions over Israeli activities in Arab East Jerusalem and the simmering tensions between Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz.
Arab states have asked Israel to halt the work at Islam’s third holiest shrine, charging it could damage the mosque’s foundations. Palestinian militants have threatened to end a three-month old Gaza truce with Israel.
Three paragraphs, three references to Islam, Arabs, and their shrines and religion. Not a single word about the fact that the Temple Mount is THE holiest site in Judaism, bar none. This is the most you get, in the fourth paragraph:
Israel said the holy places would not be harmed by what it called an attempt, mandated by law, to salvage artifacts before construction of a pedestrian bridge leading to the complex known to Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif and to Jews as Temple Mount.
And then, toward the very end of the article, Reuters acknowledges that maybe, just maybe, the site may be of value to Jews:
The compound, where two biblical temples once stood and Muslims believe Mohammad ascended to heaven, is in Arab East Jerusalem, which Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war and annexed in a step that has not won international recognition.
This is why we call them: Al-Reuters
On BBC world the Temple Mount, which is ALWAYS called Al-Aqsa, is being referred to as Islam’s third holiest site, while only as “revered by Israelis”.
That’s it, just “revered by Israelis”.
Actually it’s Judaism’s holiest site, not just revered by Israelis.
Goebbels would be so proud.
Pardon my reference to a naughty racist term, but when will AP and Reuters refer to East St. Louis as N—-r East St. Louis?
Reuters is the Arabs advertising company-no credibility whatsoever !
I’ve always wondered, in the five times a day that Moslems pray, how many times is Jerusalem mentioned?
Then compare that to the number of references to Jerusalem in the three sets of daily prayers in Judaism. (One may add in Birkat Hamazon, as well, but we don’t want to confuse the goyim too badly.) I think that would give a good estimation of the relative historical importance of the city to the two religions.
The Moslem prayers, do not actually say anything. Apparently, all they do is say variations of “G-d is great” “Muhammed is great” etc. It would seem that they do not actually ask for anything or say anything in any case.
Actually, a better response would be to determine the way the Muslims actually treated the Temple Mount during various periods in history. When they were not actually fighting for the land, the entire area was actually ignored and treated as insignificant. It was only when someone else took over that they suddenly “discovered” that it was a “holy” site.
In point of fact, Muhammed originally had them bow to Jerusalem in order to try to con Jews into joining him. When that failed, he picked a direction that would allow the Muslims to moon Jerusalem every time they prayed (since most Muslims lived between Mecca and Jerusalem.
I found the following by a google search of Muslim prayers.
http://www.allaboutturkey.com/pray.htm
http://islam.about.com/c/ht/01/03/How_Pray0985072209.htm
I guess that is why they can do it five times a day.