So, Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker who would be King President, totally blew her little Middle East peacemaking trip. Turns out she couldn’t even pass along a simple message correctly.
The Prime Minister’s Office has strongly denied that Israel relayed a message to Syria, accepting its calls to renew peace negotiations.
The bureau responded to questions raised yesterday by a statement made by U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, following a meeting with Syrian President Bashar Assad. Pelosi said she had relayed a message from Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, to the effect that Israel was ready for peace talks with Syria.
The Prime Minister’s Office was quick to issue a denial, stating that “what was discussed with the House speaker did not include any change in Israel’s policy, as it has been presented to international parties involved in the matter.”
In a special statement of clarification, the bureau stressed that Olmert had told Pelosi that Israel continued to regard Syria as “part of the axis of evil and a party encouraging terrorism in the entire Middle East.”
According to sources at the Prime Minister’s Office, “Pelosi took part of the things that were said in the meeting, and used what suited her.”
When even the WaPo says you’re a maroon, you have to think that maybe, just maybe, Pelosi screwed up.
Ms. Pelosi was criticized by President Bush for visiting Damascus at a time when the administration — rightly or wrongly — has frozen high-level contacts with Syria. Mr. Bush said that thanks to the speaker’s freelancing Mr. Assad was getting mixed messages from the United States. Ms. Pelosi responded by pointing out that Republican congressmen had visited Syria without drawing presidential censure. That’s true enough — but those other congressmen didn’t try to introduce a new U.S. diplomatic initiative in the Middle East. “We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace,” Ms. Pelosi grandly declared.
Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush’s military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi’s attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.
As for Baby Assad, the Dorktator: He’ll be milking this one for the next ten years. I have but one final comment to make, Speaker Pelosi: Presidential powers.
He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur
That’s PRESIDENT. PRES-I-DENT.
It’s from the Constitution. You should read it sometime.
Perhaps she’ll start paying attention when people start calling her Nancy Hijabi.
chsw
OTOH, nothing will shock Teheran Rose back to reality.
I heard one congressman say that Ms. Pelosi also violated the Logan Act as well, first passed in 1799 and amended in 1994. Any international lawyers out there?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000953—-000-.html
You know Condi has been rather a dsiappointment to me as Sec State but if this represents Speaker Pelosi (D. Cloudcuckooland) trying out for a spot in the majors I think she had best go back down to the minors for a looong time.