Let’s see if I can interpret the words of the Egyptian foreign minister yesterday:
“We have a difficult situation in Iraq and in the Palestinian territory,” Aboul Gheit said. “We cannot allow another hotspot of tension to develop.”
“Regarding the Palestinian problem, it has been a hot spot for 60 years already. You can add the situation in Iraq to that problem,” he said. “We have to relieve this tension at some point because the Middle East needs stability, development and peace … stability and peace will naturally lead to a change in the relationship of the Islamic Arabic world with the West.”
Here’s what I think he really meant: “Holy crap! You can’t touch Syria and Lebanon, because when you’re done with them, we’ll be the only dictatorship left in the area!”
That’s right. Egypt is feeling the cold wind of freedom on its neck.
Here’s hoping. A Middle East of democracies is a Middle East mostly at peace.
Meryl
I too have been feeling an undercurrent of something maybe good about to happen in the middle east. An american army in Iraq and Iraqis going to the polls? Egypt staggering towards democracy? Maybe? Assad screwing up. Lebanon looking to free itself? Expressing the feeling openly is obviously tempting the evil eye, which your thoughtful post skillfully (but narrowly) avoids.
Dry Bones
They worry about the Palestinians but give little thought to their own.
At the boiling point