A meme that has caught on in far too many places has been bothering me for quite some time. “X are the new Jews,” goes the meme. Sullivan whined about gays being “the new Jews.” Slate declared Asians “the new Jews.” The worst part of the meme, the one that drives me to see a curtain of red across my eyes, is the meme that the Muslims are “the new Jews.”
I started to write an essay on this topic, but Fjordman beat me to it (via Solomonia).
Jews in the 1930s were a minority everywhere, and had no country they could call their own. Jewish refugees were rejected by many countries even when some of them tried to escape the rise of the Nazis. Muslims today count more than one billion individuals, and constitute the majority in about 60 countries worldwide. In most of these countries, non-Muslims face various levels of discrimination, or even in some the continuous threat of physical extermination. Jews in Western countries do not constitute a terror threat, and never have. Muslims do all the time. Jews do not have a history of more than 1000 years of armed attacks on Europe, India, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia. Muslims do. Jews do not cut the throats of Buddhist monks in Thailand, massacre Hindus in Bangladesh or stab Christian nuns in Egypt. Muslims do. Jews do not take hostages, decapitate them and distribute videos of their acts. Muslims do. Jews do not gang rape Christian women in Western nations. Muslims do. Jews represent the most prosperous and talented ethnic groups in Europe. Muslims in Europe are ranked close to the bottom of all indicators of education and social achievements. Muslims, being 20 % of the world’s population, have produced only three Nobel laureates in science and literature, whereas Jews, being only 0.2% of the world’s population, have received more than 120 Nobel prizes in science, economics, medicine and literature. Jews before WW2 filled up Europe’s universities. Muslims now fill up Europe’s prisons.
In fact, the comparisons to the 1930s make a lot more sense if you compare Muslims to the Nazis. And there was a connection, even during WW2. Adolf Hitler is reputed to have stated his admiration for Islam, and thought it would be a better match for Nazism than Christianity, with its stupid notions of compassion for inferior people. Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem and the leader of Muslim fundamentalists in Palestine, resided in Berlin as a welcome guest of the Nazis throughout the years of the Holocaust. The Nazi-Islamic love affair remains strong. Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ is a bestseller in Islamic nations such as Turkey, at the same time as Turkish PM Erdogan wants anti-Islamism to be accepted as a crime against humanity in the EU. And not few Muslim leaders state their wish to finish what the Nazis started. Broadcasts from imams in the Palestinian Authority have stated that: “The day will come when we will rule America. The day will come when we will rule Britain and the entire world – except for the Jews. Listen to the Prophet Muhammad, who tells you about the evil end that awaits Jews. The stones and trees will want the Muslims to finish off every Jew.”
Read it all.
As much as I understand the point here, comparisons to Nazism always make me wary, either because they trivialize Nazism or because their overuse trivializes the current horrors being perpetuated.
It is also fascinating when pretentious professors and their minions pretend intellectual prowess and have the gall to minimize by co-opting. I would not have the indecency to put up a Christmas tree and call it anything other than a Christmas tree…and would not put an eye of G-d on my forehead…and would not play with Ramadan. Who are these bums to tinker and minimize what is a part of me? {And in the case of the professor and the lawyer in the article, what did their forebears do to stop the Holocaust, Darfur, Armenia, or anything else?
I consider a public Xmas tre, the same idea as a public Menorah, or a public dinner to break the Ramadan fast. A public acknowledgement by a particular religion of something that is sacred to that religion and that religion alone. I would not be part of the celebration of another religion, but I would not regard it as something to be suppressed.