If I were someone who only read the headlines, boy, would I think those Israelis are the villains in these pieces.
Hamas Offers Peace Talks for 6 Months
Israel rejects Palestinian peace offer
Meshal: Israel is to blame for lack of progress on Shalit deal
Wow. Look at those bloodthirsty Israelis. Hamas offered them a truce, and they told Hamas to go eff off. Then, it’s all their fault that the deal to return their kidnapped soldier fell through. Why, it’s like Israel expects terrorists not to kidnap soldiers, or something! And to top it off, that nameless, faceless “Israel” went and killed two palestinians. A medic said so.
So, let’s take a look at the stories behind the headlines. That “truce” being offered? Not so much.
Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas said armed factions had agreed Thursday to halt rocket fire in exchange for a complete cessation of Israeli military operations in Gaza and the West Bank.
“The ball now is in the Israeli court,” Haniyeh said. “It (Israel) must stop its aggression and escalation against the Palestinian people, then there will be no problem according to what the factions agreed in their last meeting.”
The deal is this: Israel doesn’t get to try to prevent suicide attacks, capture terrorists who are trying to or who already have killed Israelis, find and destroy weapons caches, and prevent terror attacks on her people. In return, the palestinians say they will stop firing rockets—from Gaza, which no longer has a single Jewish citizen—into Israeli territory. There’s also that little issue about palestinian prisoners. Hamas wants them all released, even the ones who are in prison for life for having murdered or conspired to murder Israelis.
Now for the latest truce offering, which is under the bland headline of Hamas Offers Peace Talks for 6 Months. What the headline should actually say is “Hamas threatens uprising if Israel doesn’t fold,” but hey, that’s just me.
Hamas’ leader said Saturday his group was willing to give peace negotiations with Israel six months to reach an agreement for a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank, but threatened a new uprising if the talks fail.
The comments by the group’s Damascus-based supreme leader Khaled Mashaal were double-edged. It was the strongest confirmation by the Hamas political chief that the Islamic militant group would allow moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to try to negotiate with Israel. But it was also the first time he has set a deadline with an explicit threat of a new uprising.
“We give six months to open real political horizons … We agreed on the national accord to establish a Palestinian state, with the June 4, 1967 borders,” he told a news conference in Cairo, referring to Israel’s borders before it captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. “They have to seize this opportunity.”
If an agreement is not reached within that time frame, Mashaal threatened a new confrontation with Israel.
“Hamas will become stronger and the resistance will resume … and will go on with a third uprising,” he said.
That word, “resume”—I don’t think it means what you think it means. In order to resume something, it has to have stopped. Hamas has never stopped trying to kill Israelis.
But notice how the AP acknowledges the threat in the lead, but downplays it, and still tries to blame Israel for it. There is a name for asking for something and threatening violence if you don’t get it. It’s called blackmail.
Now to the two palestinians who were killed by “Israel“:
Israeli soldiers clashed with Palestinian gunmen in the northern Gaza Strip on Saturday, killing one militant, hospital officials said.
In a separate incident overnight, an unidentified Palestinian was shot dead by Israeli troops while approaching the strategic Karni border crossing.
Ah. Terrorists, trying to kill Israelis, were killed by soldiers. Funny how they can’t even call them “militants” in the headline, when they do in the story. But hey, then al-Rotters wouldn’t get as many Europeans to hate Israel as they do.
Lastly, this classic piece in Ha’aretz, taken from the wire services: It’s all Israel’s fault that Hamas won’t give back their kidnapped soldier.
Also Saturday, Meshal blamed Israel for the lack of progress on a deal that would lead to an agreement to free Shalit, captured by Hamas militants in June, in exchange for some 1,000 Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails.
“We are not the reason behind postponing the decision; the postponing of a settlement is due to the other side,” Meshal said.
There is apparently no cognitive dissonance in quoting a Hamas terrorist blaming the victim for not yielding to the kidnappers’ demands. The AP writes it, and Ha’aretz—and thousands of other newspapers around the world—print it. And the hatred for Israel rises, as does world anti-Semitism. But that’s a post for another time.
To me, the “willingness” of Hamas to
negotiate with those it believes are
‘unworthy of life’, shows a certain
desparation in their position.
If only the World [UN, EU, State
Department] will allow the IDF to
finish the job in Gaza. But then
the obvious goals of those three
groups – and Hamas – are to rid
the world of those “troublesome
Jews”. I’m sure that’s what Kofi
dreams of each night. While smiling
and laughing to the screams of the
700,000 Rwandan’s he allowed to be
murdered.