You know, I really don’t care about the news today. I’m going to be busy going out and looking for some Muslims to backlash.
US Homeland Security officials are working with groups around United States to head off any possible anti-Muslim backlash following the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas, the agency’s chief said Sunday.
The comments by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano also appeared part of efforts to reassure the Arab world that US authorities were taking measures to quell anti-Islam sentiments after last week’s rampage by an American-born Muslim serving as US Army psychiatrist.
Anti-Muslim backlash incidents are famous in America, as we all know. Why, simply thousands of them were recorded after 9/11, possibly even hundreds of thousands or millions. (Most of them were covered up by the Zionist-controlled media, which is why you only heard of a few.) Muslims are afraid to show their faces in the United States, and the’ve stopped emigrating to this country because they fear the dreaded anti-Muslim backlash of me and my fellow Americans. Wait… what’s that? Attacks against Muslims have decreased since 9/11? That can’t be right. I’m backlashing! My fellow Americans are backlashing! Dammit, we want to backlash!
Napolitano said her agency is working with state and local groups to try to deflect any anti-Muslim anger after the Thursday attacks by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.
“This was an individual who does not, obviously, represent the Muslim faith,” she said after meeting with a group of women university students.
Well, at least our director of homeland security knows that Americans are going to backlash against Muslims after a Muslim on jihad murdered thirteen and wounded dozens. And Muslim leaders are totally worried about “immediate reprisals.” Yeah, they should be. Because it’s obvious that there’s a need for it.
Anti-Discrimination Committee President Mary Rose Oakar called on law enforcement agencies “to provide immediate protection for all mosques, community centers, schools and any locations that may be identified or misidentified with being Arab, Muslim, South Asian or Sikh.”
While officials in other cities have stepped up security outside mosques and other Muslim institutions in the aftermath of the shootings, a police spokesman in Baltimore said the department had yet to receive any request to do so here.
“Our [intelligence] community has their ears very low to the ground when it comes to dealing with these populations,” spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said. “We kind of have a good sense as to what their needs are, and we react accordingly.”
Wait—what? What are they talking about? The AP has declared that there is an immediate backlash, and Napolitano has assured Muslim nations that America will protect the Muslims within her borders from the crazy, angry mobs that are going to backlash against them because a Muslim connected to the 9/11 bombers murdered 12 soldiers and a civilian on Friday.
Hasan, the sole suspect in the massacre of 13 fellow US soldiers in Texas, attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, Virginia, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terrorists, The Sunday Telegraph has learnt. His mother’s funeral was held there in May that year.
The preacher at the time was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Yemeni scholar who was banned from addressing a meeting in London by video link in August because he is accused of supporting attacks on British troops and backing terrorist organisations.
Hasan’s eyes “lit up” when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki’s teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday’s horrific shooting spree.
Don’t be ridiculous. That’s not why we have to backlash. Just because he really was an anti-American Islamic jihadist doesn’t mean that we can’t backlash against the Religion of Peace™.
Come on, who’s with me! Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
This is JUST like the time that ten thousand Catholics went crazy, BURNED down Canton MI, and killed hundreds of comic book fans over Kevin Smith’s movie Dogma. In which Catholicism was lampooned and made fum of!
Or the time a Jew killed people, and the leaders of the Jewish faith supported him and were only saddened that he didn’t kill more!
Or…. Or…. Hold on…
Wait a minute…. What backlash? (foul language ahead) What the #$@^ are they talking about? Over 3,000 Americans were killed and there was never any real backlash! Muslims in Dearborn CELEBRATED the attacks, and there was never any backlash!
What a bunch of political correct bull shit! LEt’s imagine for a second what REAL backlash is.
What would have happened in Iran if 13 people had been killed by a Jew screaming “Am Yisrael Chia!” (spelling, sorry) There would have been an instant and REAL backlash, hundreds of people would have been killed in anger.
And what would happen if an entire movie was made lampooning Islam? I’m sure it would involve a death threat. And many “sensitive” countries would ban it.
What a bunch of ass hats. Pulling the wool over the eyes of the idiots in this country. I don’t know what’s worse. Dear leader and his cronies doing this, of the American people LETTING them do this…
Actually, there was a backlash in some parts of the U.S. Remember the group of thugs who headed for a Chicago-area mosque? They were stopped dead by hordes of police. Because here in America, our police actually protect minorities, unlike, say, in the Arab and Muslim world.
Geez instead of protecting the perpetrators, the authorities should be taking the necessary steps to protect the public from this “islamic backlash” (assault). But they are to PC to care.
Meanwhile, the left refuses to even acknowledge that the Fort Hood shooting was a terrorist act and insists upon laying blame here, there, and elsewhere, but anywhere other than on the murderer, himself.
They blame the Bush administration or an alleged “culture of hatred” in the US or the military or… or… or… anything but the guy who actually committed the crime.
“Muslims fear backlash from tomorrow’s train bombing.”
That was the satirical line that a commenter at Tim Blair’s, I think, used to expose the hollowness of the “feared backlash” against Muslims.
How about if Muslims drive out of their communities the imams and others who support jihad? If they suppressed the terrorists and their enablers among them they would have no reason to fear any “backlash”.