As a middle aged (to be PC, of course) person, I thought that my ability to be surprised is somewhat dulled by the years. So, in a way, I should be thankful to one Adrian Hamilton for the Indy article Israel has no future as a purely Jewish state. It did surprise me – as an astonishing example of nincompoopery.
One can start one’s fisking with the headline of the article, specifically that “purely Jewish” term. Whatever meaning the author assigned to it, he is, probably, unaware of the ethnic structure of Israel, nor did he read the Israeli declaration of independence , which clearly states that, while being a Jewish state, it will also “will uphold the full social and political equality of all its citizens, without distinction of race, creed or sex“. How well is this promise kept is another matter, but definitely better than the world batting average.
One can also take an exception to the statement that the infamous loyalty oath – as stupid an idea as any politico gave birth to lately, agreed – “is a case of racist discrimination on any interpretation“. I bet that Mr Hamilton will be hard pressed to prove it – simply because it isn’t racist and there is nothing in his arsenal of poor logic to help him out…
But really, the above is small change. Trifles. Bubkes. What really takes the cake is the following:
The more closely you define Israel as a uniquely “Jewish” state, the less room there is for it to act as a co-operative member of a Muslim majority Middle East.
Amazing. Jaw dropping. Fan-effing-tastic. A member of multi-cultural progressive British elite who in any other situation will risk his life for your right to express your personal ethnic “I”, even if that expression includes… nevermind, this guardian of human rights states that it’s not really a good idea to be “uniquely Jewish” in the midst of a Muslim majority. Not to dwell on the fact that Israel was already defined (in 1948, see above) as “uniquely Jewish” – how does the multi-culti soul of Mr Hamilton allow him even to think in such – really racist this time – terms? How does his soul allow his stomach to keep his lunch while writing this revolting racist crapola? That is, assuming that he has written it after lunch, of course. Because, being a clever man, he has done it, most probably, well in advance of the meal.
OK. Let’s move on. Because I have misled you, my dear reader. I have withheld the best part for later. Because, while the previous quote takes the cake, this one takes the cherry from that delicious dollop of whipped cream on top. It’s a promise:
Its [Israel’s] role becomes that of an enclave which views itself as not just separate but in clear opposition to everyone else about it.
So, being Jewish state is just the ticket to be viewed as “opposition to everyone else about”. Mmm… good, even brilliant job of exhibiting your inner self, Mr Hamilton, I would say…
Now is the time for a short experiment: in the two quotes above replace “Israel” by “Scotland”, “Jewish” by “Scottish” (or “Scotch” – what the heck do I know?) and, of course, “Muslim majority Middle East” by “British majority United Kingdom”. Try it out and see if it’s palatable…
Cross-posted on SimplyJews
The British will twist and turn logic, and typically bend over so far that they eventually wind up with their head up their collective asses! For example, ask them about their occupation of Northern Ireland, or, the Falkland Islands, or to the strict Arab/Muslim controlled countries and listen to the response they provide!
Actually, that is why we are known as “Hebrew”. Avraham was called Ivri because he was on one side and trhe whole world was on the other. He was right and everyone else was wrong. This is what has allowed us to survive until today and this is what will allow us to continue in the future.
What is more true is that England has no future as a British state. For a while is was OK that British anti-Semitism was less severe than that which was exhibited on the continent. But now, of course, British Jews face a stark dilemma. They can become “British” and leave Judaism behind. Or then can leave Britian. It is surely obvious to all who actually pay attention that that is exactly what is happening.
Some British Jews will give up their religion. Many British Jews will emigrate. Some will make aliyah. Most that leave will come here to the United States where it is possible to become an American regardless of previous station or situation. Ronald Reagan was 100% accurate when he stated that any person can become American without regard to creed or skin color or place of birth or class.
So those British Jews who wish to do so will become American citizens. Without having to forsake their Jewishness. And where hundreds of millions of us Goyim will welcome and love our new Jewish American citizens. The same way we completely support and love all our Israeli friends – Jewish and Gentile alike.
Dear Sabba Hillel,
I may accept your statement “He was right and everyone else was wrong.”, even if it’s too sweeping in its all-inclusiveness. I am too uncertain about anything to claim that any side is absolutely right on any subject (and I think that I am sticking here to the nice Jewish tradition of doubting everything).
However, I am much more incensed by the statement made by Mr Hamilton “views itself as not just separate but in clear opposition to everyone else”. Being separate is far from being “in clear opposition” – I hope we can agree on this.
Cheers.
Dear Herschel,
I think I would not ask Brits about their occupation of Northern Ireland, or the Falklands. They become too agitated and may spill their beers, and we really wouldn’t want this.
Dear Anon,
While I agree that the island of Albion is looking to difficult times, I hope that the British Jewry will not have to leave anytime soon.
In any case, thanks for your kind words.
Scottish or Scots. Scotch is an alcoholic drink.
Thanks, Stretch.