We are now the United Surveilled States of America. And screw us if we don’t like it.
The government is slowly but surely starting to look like Soviet Russia.
Early on in the Snowden leaks, it was revealed that Snowden himself was using email services from an operation called Lavabit, which offered extremely secure email. However, today Lavabit’s owner, Ladar Levison, shut down the service, claiming it was necessary to do so to avoid becoming “complicit in crimes against the American people.” Not much more information is given, other than announced plans to fight against the government in court. Reading between the lines, it seems rather obvious that Lavabit has been ordered to either disclose private information or grant access to its secure email accounts, and the company is taking a stand and shutting down the service while continuing the legal fight. It’s also clear that the court has a gag order on Levison, limiting what can be said.
Here’s what the owner of Lavabit wrote:
I have been forced to make a difficult decision: to become complicit in crimes against the American people or walk away from nearly ten years of hard work by shutting down Lavabit. After significant soul searching, I have decided to suspend operations. I wish that I could legally share with you the events that led to my decision. I cannot. I feel you deserve to know what’s going on–the first amendment is supposed to guarantee me the freedom to speak out in situations like this. Unfortunately, Congress has passed laws that say otherwise. As things currently stand, I cannot share my experiences over the last six weeks, even though I have twice made the appropriate requests.
The government officials who are spying on Americans insult the people who object to this overweening surveillance of American citizens without cause.
And President Obama thinks he is the president of a nation of morons. He nominates the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, to set up the committee that’s going to be the “independent” and “outside” committee to investigate the surveillance of Americans by the NSA. This, mind you, is the same James Clapper who deliberately lied to Congress when he said the NSA wasn’t collecting data on U.S. citizens.
The Patriot Act was bad enough. That it was passed for another four years without debate–because debate was deliberately shut down by the Administration and its allies in Congress–shows us that Congress really doesn’t care about the Constitution they swore an oath to protect.
As for that Patriot Act–the one that gave us the TSA, which agency, we’re told, protects us against deadly terrorist threats? Well, they saved New Yorkers from the dreaded scourge of–nail polish remover. Between that, and confiscating nail clippers, the terrorists are totally on the run. Except when they force the closure of nearly two dozen U.S. embassies in Muslim nations.
But hey–keep on checking American citizens’ emails. Because that’s keeping us safe from terrorism. It’s not like they’re laughing at us now for closing our embassies or anything.
What the hell happened to my country? This started with Bush and has gone on steroids with Obama. When will we get a loud enough backlash to restore our Fourth Amendment rights?
Both parties are very weak when it comes to civil liberties. President Obama’s actions with the NSA and IRS make a mockery of his lofty rhetoric and very few Democrats seem willing to cross the president on this issue. Mainstream Republicans are little better. Governor Christie has been busy demagoguing 9/11 to try to de-legitimize anyone that questions the limits of the state’s ability to spy on its own citizens.
Personally I’m leaning towards Rand Paul in 2016. I am worried about his views on foreign policy(he seems to be trying to differentiate himself from his father) but at this point we seem sliding into a soft totalitarian state and I think he is the best bet to reverse it out of anyone with a real chance to win the presidency. At the very least he seems to take civil liberties seriously and that is my # 1 issue right now.
Do you have any thoughts Meryl? Is Rand too much like his father with regards to Israel for you to vote for him? I think a strong America is important in a dangerous world but I think a free America is more important at this point. There is little point in being strong if we give up our core values to get there.
Of course Obama and his consiglieri believe the American people are morons. They elected him to the presidency twice. What more proof does he need?
Shtetl G: I’m not a one-issue voter. If I thought Rand would bring this country back on the right path, I would vote for him. And frankly, if he cut aid to Israel, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. Nor would Benjamin Netanyahu. It’s only a fraction of Israel’s budget, and it will shut up the people who say Americans shouldn’t pay for Israel’s army (they don’t, but that’s not the point).
Do I think he hates Jews like his daddy does? I don’t get that vibe from him. But I don’t know him personally.
I don’t think that Paul is going to get the nomination, but then again, I didn’t think anyone should buy Yahoo! stock, either.
Thanks for the reply. I was never a one issue voter but the fact that our country seems hell bent on becoming a surveillance state has elevated civil liberties as the top issue for me right now (next would be shrinking the size of our leviathan government because I don’t think we can afford it and also to diminish the power that is concentrating around DC).
Here is a link from overlawyered about not trusting email:
http://overlawyered.com/2013/08/if-you-knew-what-i-know-about-email-you-might-not-use-it/#comments
I wonder if we can put the genie back in the bottle?